Don's Home Places California Earthquakes Central Valley and Sierra Nevada Earthquakes
Date Where Magni-
tude
Fault Deaths Property
Damage (M)
1872 Owens Valley (Lone Pine) 7.4 Owens Valley 27 $0.250
1892 Vacaville 6.6   1 $0.225
1892 Winters 6.4      
1980 Mammoth Lakes 6.2     $1.5
1983 Coalinga (Fresno Co.) 6.4     $31
1966 Truckee 5.9      

Google Map

Mono Lake, Mammoth Lakes, Long Valley Geology
Mammoth Lakes M 6.2 quake 1980

After the 1980 earathwuakes geoligists discovered that the central part of Long Valley Caldera, a broad depression formed in a cataclysmic volcanic eruption 760,000 years ago, was slowly rising. It is natural to wonder when and where the next volcanic eruption might occur in the Long Valley area.

As long as increased volcanic unrest (including earthquake swarms, ground deformation, and CO2 gas emissions) continues in the Long Valley area, the chances of an eruption occurring in the near future will remain somewhat increased. However, evidence from large volcanic areas and calderas worldwide shows that unrest, such as the current activity in eastern California, can persist for decades or even centuries without leading to an eruption.

Most likely, the next eruption will be small and similar to previous eruptions along the Mono-Inyo volcanic chain during the past 5,000 years. Such eruptions typically begin with a series of steam-blast explosions as rising molten rock (magma) encounters and vaporizes underground water near the Earth’s surface.

Links:
Volcano-Hazard Zones for Small- to Moderate-sized Eruptions in the Long Valley -- Mono Lake Area
Future Eruptions in California’s Long Valley Area—What’s Likely? (pdf)


1983 - Coalinga (Fresno Co.) M6.4 - Nuñez M6.0
USGS summary

Many accounts attribute this to the San Andreas fault, but it was 15-20 miles north-east of Parkfield on the San Andreas fault, which was part of the M7.9 Ft. Tejon quake in 1857.

It was a thrust fault caused by a wedge of rock being pushed up as opposed to a strike slip event common on the San Andreas fault. This fault was previously unknown.
The 1971 San Fernando quake was also a thrust fault.

A report by Mason Hill says: "It is tentatively attributed here to flexural slip on the flanks of growing folds. This explanation apparently conflicts with the 100-yr-old theory that all tectonic earthquakes are caused by slip on faults. "

The quakes did reduce stress on the San Andreas fault according to a S. Toda, R. Stein report.

See Also: NY Timnes Article, May 24, 1983



pasadena.wr.usgs.gov/images/cahist_eqs.gif

Return to N. California Earthquakes

last updated 5 July 2009