Attached is an overview from a citizen who did a lot of research on the issue but wants to remain anonymous.
The Federal guidelines are quite general. For example, if you read through Standard FAC-003-1 - Transmission Vegetation Management Program (from the NERC website ftp://www.nerc.com/pub/sys/all_updl/standards/rs/FAC-003-0.pdf) you will see that there is no 15' regulation (correctly so). The Federal government just wants the States (a.k.a the "Transmission Owner") to have a plan to deal with vegetation and maintain the transmission grid. The 15' rule is a NJ regulation. Trust me, I have spoken with the utility boards at several states and they all have different rules. Most states are more relaxed in their standards. But some, notably NY, are even stricter (at least by the regulation, perhaps not in practice). I know that you are all upset about this and you should be. Look at the second attachment (my yard ~ 200' from my house) - that should provide motivation to keep true to your cause. Here are a few things to keep in mind: 1. The only way you will make change is to keep everyone engaged and make sure EVERYONE shows up at the public hearings or any meetings with the BPU. I cannot emphasize this point enough.
Case in point: I met with the BPU last Spring (after the vegetation clearing)
and they were actually quite interested and accommodating. They reviewed my
proposal and scheduled a meeting where I spoke for nearly an hour. Unfortunately
only one other person from my neighborhood attended and nobody from the
Township attended. There were, however, at least 20 representatives from the utility
companies and at least 10 people from the BPU. So if you were in charge of
writing the regulations, who would you listen to: 2. Read all the regulations. Don't go by word of mouth or you lend credibility to false rumors or "potential regulations" (like the 15' rule...). Check out the NERC website ((www.nerc.com) Check out the websites in other states (Oregon and Texas have a lot of useful information). 3. Understand that there are different priorities for all the parties:
4. Finally:
|